1/23/2024 0 Comments Missing link human evolution lucy![]() ![]() This new fossil is called Australopithecus anamensis. The new discovery allegedly pushes back the earliest date when human ancestors are known to have walked upright on two legs by a half a million years. But they have other characteristics that are more like human beings, like an upright posture. But in any event, they had large canine teeth (those are the ones just to the side of your incisors) that have characteristics of apes. Apparently, it was a species that combined ape-like facial features, such as primitive jaws and ears (although I don’t know how they can get the ears out of it because ears are soft features that fossil skulls don’t have). The article states that researchers in Kenya and the United States unveiled the jaws, teeth and bones of several individuals belonging to the new pre-human species. The real question is not, what are the fossils? what have we found?, what do they look like? where are the bones in the fossil record? how old are they? The real question is, what do they mean with regards to man’s supposed evolutionary development?Īpparently, they have found a new fossil, one that is an alleged ancestor to human beings. Many Christians who want to cling to a creationist view of the world still want to dismiss these things as frauds, especially when it comes to the question of missing links in the evolutionary trail between a non-human ancestor and human beings as they are today.įor the most part there is a lot of confusion and speculation regarding these ancient ancestors or alleged missing links that need to be clarified so that you are not taken by surprise by these kinds of articles. They thought that most of them were frauds. Some of them are bones of creatures that are rather large and bizarre, and in earlier times were a frustration for Christians because they didn’t want to admit that such a thing existed. I’m not the least intimidated by the idea that there were things that used to exist that don’t exist now, which left their imprint in stone because the fossilization process took place, and now we have these things. ![]() I’ve got all kinds of fun things in there, but I’ve also got trilobites, a mammoth tooth, a chunk of fossilized dromedary tooth, fish and ferns, and all of that stuff. Grant, signed by Grant himself just a couple of months before he died. I’ve got the first edition of the memoirs of Ulysses S. I have a case with my Civil War bullets in it, pieces of mosaic that I got from the shores of the Mediterranean at Cesarea Philippi earlier this year when I was in the Holy Land. In fact, I’ve got a bunch of them around my house. I thoroughly enjoyed the article, in part because I am not in the least hostile to this kind of research. How can I reply to this? How do I respond to this? How do I explain this? It seems that once again the Christian view of the world is being undermined by new scientific evidence. The headline reads, “Bones of New Human Ancestor Found in Africa.” A lot of you probably shuddered just like me when you read that. There is an article I really enjoyed reading in the L.A. When I pick up a newspaper and see that scholars have proof of things that seem to conflict with my faith, it sends a little shiver of concern up my spine. One big assumption is that similarities in the bodies imply a biogenetic relationship and ancestry. The search for missing links assumes the truth of evolution. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |